I guess the homosexual lobby is getting desperate to justify their 'lifestyle'.
A recent Canadian study suggests that the more maternal brothers a male has, the more likely he is to be gay. Professor Anthony Bogaert (no mention of whether or not he is gay) with Brock University in Ontario, Canada concluded that a woman's body may see a male baby as foreign and prompts an immune reaction in the woman that somehow turns the boy gay.
Notably absent from the article is any rebuttal to the theory or any journalistic balance that says that the professor might be wrong. I guess they will take any theory they can get to prove to the world that they had no choice in being a homosexual.
I always get in trouble for making this comparison, but I'm going to do it anyway. If a person has a tendency toward violence should his violence simply be tolerated because "that's who he is?" Well, if he maintains control over those predilections then yes, we tolerate him. As soon as he acts on his violent nature we no longer tolerate him and he goes to jail.
No, I'm not suggesting that we lock up homosexuals. It's simply a comparison that demonstrates that just because a person is inclined to be a certain way, does not mean that he has to act on it. The Godless evolutionary crowd doesn't see it that way though except when it's convenient for them. Either we acknowledge in our laws that we are nothing more than creatures of instinct and allow us to live that way or we can make choices and show restraint and maintain an order of civility. History favors the latter.